Arundhati ‘Pakistani’ and Ram Sene ‘Patriotic’
"Shouldn't Arundhati Roy come from Pakistan?" sarcastically asked a freelance journalist in Delhi, commenting on a panel discussion, Does Media Jingoism Fan India-Pakistan Tensions? The jibe stemmed from his annoyance at Roy's consistent exposure of India's 'warts'.
Besides Arundhati, the panel, organised by the recently formed Forum of Media Professionals (www.fmp.org) at the India International Centre (IIC) on April 15, included four journalists from India. I was among the four from Pakistan in addition to The Hindu's Islamabad correspondent, Nirupama Subramanian, who was also billed as coming from Pakistan.
The dig at Arundhati set me thinking that Delhi may be cleaner and greener since I was last here five years ago, but another kind of pollution lingers, reminiscent of a phenomenon we face in Pakistan: Rightwing jingoism fuelled by emotional appeals to religion and nationalism. It feeds the bigoted competitiveness of many Indians and Pakistanis who are gleeful and self-congratulatory when they can point out how much worse off and 'different' the other is.
If Arundhati Roy should represent Pakistan because she critiques what's wrong in India, those who fight for justice - a struggle that necessitates 'washing dirty linen in public' - in Pakistan should represent India!
When I write or make a documentary film about gender violence in Pakistan, people sometimes ask why I don't expose such wrongdoings in India. "Women there are much worse off!" they argue.
Many refuse to take this myopic view. In Allahabad, at a crowded meeting of the Pakistan-India People's Forum for Peace and Democracy (PIPFPD), there was no one-upmanship or finger pointing. The audience immediately saw the commonalities of the issues raised in the films I showed (on Pakistan's discriminatory 'Hudood Laws', and rape survivor Mukhtiar Mai's struggle for justice).
The phenomenon of Taliban 'punishing' women for alleged transgressions is not very different from those who rape, kill or lynch women and eloping couples for the sake of 'honour' in traditional communities across the region. Both engage in extra-judicial, vigilante actions. However, the 'honour crimes' are mostly committed by the women's relatives, whereas the Taliban try to enforce their writ on the general populace.
Also, the family in India who hanged their daughter and the man she eloped with (in their own home) will be charged, tried and probably convicted. In Pakistan, laws imposed by a military dictator in the name of Islam allow the victim's family to 'forgive' the perpetrators - often their own relatives.
In Allahabad, senior advocate Ravi Kiran Jain, who heads the PIPFPD chapter there, stressed the dual need for a stable government in Pakistan and to remove misunderstandings between our countries. His words reminded me of Nirupama Subramanian's appeal at the IIC when she urged Indians to show empathy, "be sensitive to Pakistan as a country that has problems, show moderation in how we respond to these problems."
Many Indians understand this, but we don't often hear their voices in the media. What gets more attention is incidents like the minor disruption at the IIC when one man at the back of the auditorium stood up and shouted anti-Pakistan, pro-war slogans. The organisers threw him out. Television cameramen and photographers rushed to capture the scuffle. The incident was sensationalised and misreported.

I should watch it today. Good Review.
Very good article. Congrats on the new relaunch of the website.
Honestly I think Anna Hazare was given too much 'media overdose'. Sometimes, media needs to move on.
BTW your new...
Why should one not criticise a Nobel laureate? The prize, like any other, has often been controversial, and to be a Nobel...