25 Dec 2009 | India
What's In
ADVERTISEMENT
Most Read and Popular on HardNews
Recent comments
Any history student would tell you that Gandhi was pro-British. He even fought wars for British against the locals in South Africa. When he came...
Kartikeya, Could you please do me a favour: could you read this article with an open mind without being emotional about it? See the gulf between...
I find it unfair that people dubbed MS Dhoni as the man with the Midas touch to begin with. Dhoni’s captaincy is different from other captains. As...
It’s brilliantly written and a horribly honest account. Almost every Muslim faces such situations and more so when the person is a Kashmiri.
...It is clear that we cannot stop with one test which yielded low results, even if the thermonuclear (TN) device (H bomb) worked. We need to test...
I’m unable to understand the justification of the last line of Sadiq Naqvi’s report which provides the number of people killed in the Naxal...
The story gives us the true picture of the condition of domestic helps for whom growth rate has little meaning. Their struggle for social equality...
This is not a news article, but an opinion piece. The writer is certainly entitled to his opinion but his statistics should not be taken as fact....
This is not a news article, but an opinion piece. The writer is certainly entitled to his opinion but his statistics should not be taken as fact. Statistics, as most know, can be dug up to support almost any position. Further, just because one does not blindly support “Obama’s” plan, does not mean he or she opposes reform in our healthcare industry. If you want more competition, open up the sale of insurance across state lines. If you want to stop waste and fraud in medicare and medicaid, then let’s do it — no new plan required. If you want portability and eliminate preconditions, go for it. If you want to help with the soaring cost of medicines, how about tort reform? Cannot one have a different approach to healthcare reform without being subjected to unfair generalisations by those who try to discredit individuals rather than debate ideas?
Anonymous
Via email