Slumdog debate: The unrealised stardom

Aahana Bhatnagar Delhi

We Indians applaud the success of Slumdog Millionaire  at the Oscars, we applaud the victory of ‘Indian Music', we applaud the fame our Indian actors and technicians got there, more ironically, we even applaud for the grand recognition of the extensively glorified ‘Indian poverty' in the film.

Have Indians become blindfolded? Can't they see beyond fame? It is a matter of shame that we are applauding for the fact that we Indians have certified ourselves as a poor country, full of slums and more importantly SLUMDOGS. Poverty and slums are the only things left in India now, which are picked up as the ‘hot favourite subjects' by foreign directors. And by just depicting this one side of our country, one gets the most prestigious award of the world.

If studying just ‘Poverty and Slums' in India can bring these foreign technicians ‘close' to our country, then they do not deserve such recognition which is all incongruous, irrelevant and incomplete, without even knowing the other side of it. Can't they pick up classical Indian culture and make movies ? No, because they do not want to, because it will not make them earn awards, simply because it will not ‘sell'. Because poverty is an ‘in' phenomenon for them, they exaggerate the fact and project themselves as ‘rich' enough to deal with such sensitive issues.

Many ambiguous questions still exists. Why do our famous actors (would not name them) publicise such issues on a global platform? They are the faces of India, they are the one whom people follow and idealise. If they will magnify such a portrayal of Indian poverty in a ‘foreign film', then how will a common man perceive such an issue. The instant celebrity status of the film's no fame NRI cast is just because Indian poverty sells abroad.

Had it been a film on Indian diverse culture and aesthetics, had it been on India's growing intellect, had it been on India's advancement in myriad fields, Indians would have been happy to applaud, to cheer, to encourage, to perform yajnas all over the country for the success of the film. But no such luck.

Even while tens of thousands of poor Indians die slowly, impoverished and brutalised, in filthy urban ghettos with no infrastructural facilities or social dignity, we all go overboard celebrating the slumdog millionnaire's singular and solitary. One success story, does it reflect the entire 'slum-nation' of marginal India of billions. And how many more films can you make before their earth and sky become worth living for human beings, as Indian citizens who deserve the success stories of this democracy as anybody else?

The writer is a student of Development Communication, MCRC, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi

Comments

nice one dats simple and clear

dats true ..well i wonder how many tourists are gonna visit Taj after watching this movie..
keep goin..

danny boyle made

danny boyle made slumdog..frm point of view of western ppl...!!!!i bet no indian...would dive in shitpot to meet his/her favourate actor...

also dere were obnoxious scenes where a peson was taking out eyeball of a small child with a spoon....(censor board..listning).....

i firmly believe this movie should be boycotted in all ways but 20...30 odd ppl...can do nothing..!!!...when ppl frm our country are applauding...a few ppl can make no difference....and now its too late..

yeah...very true

Hello Aahana, this is very true and something i hv been feeling too. this is happening since long time. foreign directors getting an oscar for portraying such things...the worst is,we never see an indian director's face for oscars...rahman getting award is still not bad..coz he deserves for the music he has given us..
Same went the case with the book "The White Tiger", by Arvind Adiga, the book was appreciated outside coz it has every thing about India,which foreign people don't know at all, rather any Indian who reads that book, wont find it of that worth...anyway...media covers this happiness too...lol
I am Ayushi, about to complete my bachelors in Journalism and Mass Communication form GGSIPU. u may ask abt me from Ishant or Mohit. liked ur article so replied...n offcourse my journo bugs dropped me at d blog..

Let me be the first one to

Let me be the first one to congratulate you for a very nice post. I think when you say “Indian poverty sells abroad”, - it sums it all up. Danny Boyle or any foreign film-maker couldn’t have brought audience to the theater or won accolades showing India's growing intellect, this is so unfortunate and shows ignorance on the part of foreign film-makers and audience. I think when it comes to Slumdog Millionaire the debate is consumed by the right and wrong of it rather than the film’s excellence. I can totally understand the disgust some Indians might be feeling after watching this movie; you could pull the worst of any country in this world and make it a joy for all who cannot relate to the misery shown. It is a movie made for a British audience by a British film-maker, who doesn’t know enough about India, which is fine.. I personally have no problem with it.. it is a perspective and all perspectives are valid as cinema.. I strongly feel “Slum Dog Millionaire” doesn’t deserve the best picture award @ Oscars.

That was an honest

That was an honest observation. westerners and some of our very own indians, who pledge to be more INDIAN than the others must realise that there is more to india than slums, poverty and the great indian rope trick, its high time we did so.
as far as the movie is concerned, i would like to say, purely from an audience point of view(without any biases) that, it is an over hyped, over rated, and over acclaimed movie.
i am really concerned of what ever happened to the orcar jury as it bestowed so many awards on this film and with thir lets all break into a song and dance equence....JAI HO
Tahzeeb Fatma,